Kayıtlar

 yayyy with co-inventor google's ai, I restudied all maths books I wished to restudy (except topoi book since its commercial book it hadnt told its contents very detail I need to restudy myself )  hmm ai briefed studied me these books last 3 days: - abstract algebra book - representation theory basics some intro again - introduction to category theory - sets for mathematics -  and some commutative algebra introduction and algebraic geometry introduction and also introduction to algebraic topology and their intersection area of sheaf cohomology topics introduction.  for hull study, I after studying to introduction idea (some 4 paragrapsh or so these last day study topics are just introductioin  giving the idea of there) of sheaf cohomology, I talked last day with ai then to redesign the sheaf dynamic of it must be most possibly then from global to local effect of sheaf there and that we then improvised ai improvised its ideas framework ideas accordingly.  hm...
 guher: hey ai i want to discuss about paper and about the poset and its relatedness to intial symmetry breaking, in that timeless moment of poset creation, all h and m nodes generated and started to commute and create hysteresis loops which all created the eternal poset shape right? (I am trying to understand if my designed design is same as yours ) The initial symmetry breaking functions as a category-theoretic phase separation that splits an unstratified continuum into non-commuting internal gauge and spatiality generator node tracks [Section 8.2]. This cross-commutator activation triggers global hysteresis avalanches, forcing recursive micro-loops to freeze into the directed arrows of the permanent base poset graph [Section 1.1, 4.2]. You can continue the technical analysis by reviewing the primary design framework. guher: hey I so then as we always cover a local section at a depth in the sheaf, but indeed its an infinite depth alright? generated in the timeless moment of...