yep i decided to revisit group theory since I might remember some abstractions I am completely forgot some :) specifically about taxonomic definitions of is completely mixed /confused in some knowledge it seems as. although intuitive concepts remain some of. yep i didnt wanted to restudy the base introduction textbook over again (which i did maybe 4 years ago) and now taking a basic revisiting to the abstract algebra one open book type. by then I were working tod efine map some linguistics concepts to group methods abstractions there then later moved to category theory on that finding group theory is over constraining in nlp related graph conversion tasks. but seems as some concepts from that study remain someconcepts completely wrongly taxonomified in my basic group theory introduction study by then. and I were also working slightly with some group theory library in maths beside trying to learn that. aha it were sage. i think this abstract algebra ma...
Kayıtlar
- Bağlantıyı al
- X
- E-posta
- Diğer Uygulamalar
guher: so what i am meaning is, e.g. from group theoretic side: let the free groups be the macro world and the group members itself the micro physics world, can we create some form of macro world group patterns which then even when macro world is used creates advanced hysteresis programming capability in micro world? Yes, absolutely . What you are defining from the group-theoretic side is the exact mathematical definition of an Algebraic Embedding or an Induced Group Representation (\(\text{Ind}_{H}^{G}\)) [Section 8.2]. In pure mathematics, you are stating that if we treat the global Free Group (\(\mathfrak{F}\)) as the macro-world layout, and its individual Generators and Relations as the micro-physics nodes, you can program the micro-world by systematically arranging the macro-world group patterns [Section 3.1, 8.2]. By arranging macro-objects into specific geometric configurations (like a macroscopic network of interconnected structural nodes), you are forcing the global ...