hey how to teach a machine infimum and supremums logic. dme query tht popped up whlst stdyng this text. i guess recursion/induction is the key. hmm why does every theory tht ones i look now looks as also be creatble by machines. why not. i think machines can also create these.
ok then the continuation of Goldbach proof: second part logic were wrong (in second blog of goldbach conjecture proof) that if there is none prime from C1 equivalence class, that means number should be like: 2n / 2 = n and 2n being always less than n! makes this such number be improbable. unless number is less than value that enables C1 at most 1 more element than 1 element set, then in such case still then Goldbach conjecture wouold be true e.g. 2*3 in that case. and any more than 1 element in C1 equivalence class results of problem being considered for the solution part where there are more than 1 elements in C1 equivalence class. So Goldbach conjecture is true for every number is the conclusion yep.
Yorumlar
Yorum Gönder