whilst searching propbank and verbnet and framenet topics for SRLs area, came up to this and want to learn it:
https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/linguistics/
hmm after this i need also a 101 on linguistics. then would study the ontology topics i previously bought or might buy things on ontology domain knowledge.
then i need to find data of framenet verbnet and also SRL labels so that i work on to utilize Bert and/or Albert named frameworks to do this semantic role labels generations. then but before i need to set up algorithms of the expert system there. my expert system would even query wikipedia data on after creating its srl trees. already it is as i read pretrained on wikipedia like sources. with semi supervised learning. hmmm. so need to build a demo before the meeting i think i should. to investigate the applicability of my idea on how to do this. i from even from outside see alot of potential in expert systems area nbow that linguistics frameworks are this much nice/good. so it would double use wikipedia data, for both in pretrained Bert side and for second time, this time for storing such comprehension with its classes in its linguistics. and would try to understand the concept of it both from frame net and both from rdf from wikipedia. in second wiki traversel would add additional properties to the SRL graphs built. and in overall a db would be constructed.
yayyy its super fun to get into linguistics area:) always wanted but never had a chance to spare time. it seems as kind of difficult area but fun also. would merge it with ontology area knowledge i would learn/read about today.
topics i study now are truly dope. learning about emergentism and such topics. super fun .yayyy starting with philosophy of linguistics but aside i learn other such topics meaning:).
some dope things to learn about:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emergentism
this is fun to learn. wov this philosophy course on linguistics even first paragraph make me learn alot of things.
then would learn structural part of linguistics which i surfaced with reading Levin 93 paper. then would come the ontology study.
i want to parse the SRL trees and create an index structure. so it would be a new form of indexed db but would be very fun to develop. there is no huge data so efficiency concerns would might be postponed. working very correctly with very best consize method matters more than efficiency in this part. and of course the efficiency part would be also implemented with to be built indexing structures. but we arent talking of very big data so in the end(due to nature of task), it wouldnt need efficiency nature of an algorithm like pagerank. but for sure efficiency part would also be built. but more important is i think i want my system to comprehend what it reads fully (except images part, that which might be added later). and do its task alike with such approach.
some graph transformations for directed acyclic graphs such algorithms i would also revise. in creating understandings from srl graphs. would try to create bayesian inferences on it. to map one type of query to another graph. but it would be in non demo version. but in demo thing i want to create the initial very raw indexed structure where semantic queries arent handled in such representation. smoe level of uncertainity metric on bayesian inferencing for sure would be present i guess. but bits by bit such system would reach to be designed to be a comprehensing system as its design evolves along the time. i have one very nice bayesian inference book i would also reread sections when i come to this advancing semantic queries investigating part. or similarity in between semantic comprehensions part.
ok saw more dope topics:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Property_dualism
my conscioussnes study (or nonconscious expert system in cloud) would i guess be both emergentist and both reductionist in parts ofit in guh clone in cloud project(future hobby/on free times to work on project). but reading these knowledge is definitely so nice. learning them i like to reahc out to learn these knowledge. (i wish coders wont shoot me down for creating a coder in cloud:P ) (i really have such project goal for that hobby project:P but i wouldnt make it available to common use:) so that coders industry wont shoot me down:P i decided it would be more nice if my game engine gets written by a virtual coder in cloud:) which would study opengl book['s tedius details itself:P )
hmm would try to summarize my ontology based different platform holding consciouss or learning entity with reductionist and contrarily emergentist ideas:) after i read that. i figured out my idea is more leaning on reductionist side in its core, for reducing and even translating the system to a differnt platform. but, its also emergentist in the sense, i dont think its any static like a reductionist system and new properties new ontologies could emerge. so i would wanted an embraced theory of theory of mind problem for my design of guh the coder on cloud. i believe the duality both exists and doesnt exist. that there is both epiphenomenalism going on, but both the mind altering the physical state. a bidirectional way. but not eliminating epiphenomenalism approach. i think it could be tried to be tested to create such dualism on different systems. without being bound to original design of our brains. so in overall, i dont think underlyingly, the emergentist and reductionist are fully mutually exclusive in ontological level. they cover differnt parts in differnt ontology levels. so i would want an embraced theory and quite specialization of each idea sets' mapping to differnt ontology layers. that to prove that they are not mutually exclusive. so guh the coder project, in that, would study this philosophical discussions part and would try to brainstorm in devising that. i definitely believe lean on reductionism and at the same time emergentist side, and a covering approach to both would be happening in such project.
ayy i loved that this philosophy of linguistics made me sail to these pages which i think are awesome interesting things to read learn about. (kind of dope).
ok back to reading theory of linguistics. then would read 101 of linguistics. for main approaches and frameworks. and verb classes and a phone came from mom tjat interrupted and i dont know what i were saying:P :)))))))
nice to come to some mathematical nominalism named topic and important author there since guh coder would need a nice ontology of maths.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nominalism
wov. these topics i read are all dope. super fun to learn about. i knew plato's realist approach but had no idea there existed a contrarian nominalist approach :)
and its important to learn to build the core of knowledge in this task i work on(for to propose a very extensive project proposal on wednesday) . for how to represent ontologies of SRL, it would be nice to read mathematical ontology studies even if its not the same topic, one might help to create constructs in other domain.
ok continueing studying this text of philosophy of linguistics.
this text is pure dope:
https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/linguistics/
i just cant define the happiness level that finding out from this text that the topic i wonder about SRLs is actually called generative grammars and equality of constructs in there be investigated by tree operations topic . hmm so would check texts of generative grammars topic while working on that part.
meanwhyile my mom came. i made some break to study to wash my hair.
found out a nice relaxing wind rain sound.
working on this text. then would go on to ontology part. i guess i would work on Bert demos on SRL generations invesatigation on tomorrow evening. since visibly this day would pass all reading things.
among all approaches there, i found emergentists approach more intriguing. even definition of emergentism is intriguing alot. even if i lean more to the reductionist side. i mean its so beatiful concepts there. totally dope. i really liked this linguistics area from start:) i were always interested but never had spared any time before and found out its a truly amazing area.
ok every paragraph in this text is dope. full of information type i very like. i predicted/felt i would like linguistics. but ddnt know it were this much dope. to read about.
for since before going to other parts, i need some ontology area readings. to feel confident in init of designed methods for closing the weekend and for experimenting things on monday/sunday.
but seems to me, there is a lot to read about both generative grammers side and emergentist approach side and logical formalisms mappings that which some Essensialists would strongly debate against.
I as want to deviate from that view on thinking we could create semantic formalisms separately as a concept in linguistics, for syntax and selection on how to do that, needs more study to both essentialists and emergentists side as i see.
for that study i plan to accomplish, now its time to break this dope level fun of reading this text which is one of the most dope texts i ever read for ages, i need to revise ontology side studies in general and those frameworks methodologies. to foresee design of my design choices there in how to really understand a semantics representation inside a system. that which be disputed by many people as i read, so their dispute arguments i would reread on this regard, for since its one basis of my solution/design. so would continue to surface linguistics area knowledge to try to attain to some level on the surface, but in tandem now is ontology frameworks/epistemology of ontology area time.
i really liked some nice points shown by essentialists, like refutations of individuation's generalizations or constructions on emergentists perspectives, with using bayesian inference methods there. i guess there is a lot to read study. for regarding design of semantics structure of raw SRLs. and disputes about that so that whether my basis design would be covering all aspects? and which points it has disputes against by which sides on which points.
but then its ontology study time to feel an iteration in my project proposal. i would loved to study all chapters this night but i need to iterate on my design exploration task. for since i need to do experiments on tomorrow night and also tuesday night.
i also find this area's discussions/rebuttals also dope as i read. all things in this text is all dope.
unrelatedly, about guh the coder in cloud hobby project:P (that which i wish coder industry wont shoot me:P as told, when if it gets ready, wouldnt publicize it ever :) )
linguistic relativism related paragraph makes me think my reductionist and both emergentist system is really be possible to be build and be a learning expert system that would code my game engine. yayyy :) i just couldnt stop reading that section and see yayyy my silly raw intuition on that its now possible to do such expert system is slightly supported by that view:) a slight level of sup[prot sure, not knowing surely, in the end after studying, these paragraphs might create an antithetical stance to my guh in the cloud hobby project idea. initially at least that section felt as it is not antithetical, but i know nothing yet about linguistics as visible. so would see after studying/surfacing more.
and most important thing is the project proposal yepp.
but i think i should sleep now and study ontology frameworks in tandem to experimentations on tomorrow night cause i really feel super sleepy right now. feeling need to rest/sleep . i copuld manage analysis of ontology frameworks epistemology on topmrorow night with tandem bert srl studies...
yayyy resting time
Yorumlar
Yorum Gönder