ok lets read about Aristotle's force definition more later when work ends. read on morning. on these metaphysical domains.  maybe i give  break to work time with coffee and read 10 minutes reading. yupp. lets do it. 

ok break is over. i never read Freud in this much detail and started to think i might also dislike Freud's studies some part. i only read Freud before very roughly and about scapegoats behaviors but now as reading about psychoanalysis in detail, i decided i mimght start reverting back talking too much of Freud since his thinking disciplines i might dislike. as i learn more about. i started to dislike Freud. as i read about psychoanalysis introduction. but nonetheless would read about this book. its not all about Freud, its also Schopenhauer, Leibniz and also Husserl, and i saw force systems is not having homomorphism to physics but more in eidetics and metaphysical domains. I came reupon the consciousness and will studies also which is happy. and also nomunalistic representations and phonemonal representations differences. a new look to consciousness studies i left reading long ages ago. but this time from psychoanalysis perspective and its intersection to philosophy science. this text i read would be a journey to learn about psychoanalysis named topic that i hadn't read about before. its relation to consciousness is also amazing and the level of philosophy talks attained in discussions is severely fun, normally i don't like reading psychology since its very intricate level of ontology level and i guess i am simply not interested about, but since now discussion goes along using philosophical language and philosophers discussions, i found that i could read psychology more if philosophers tell about it. normally kind of not severe interest area of me, to read psychology. but the language they talk and the structures they construct define is completely philosophical in this text that made me severely interested to read about. if i were interested to psychoanalysis i would read long before. its just philosophical language in this text made me interested. and its very interesting to get to this ontology level without normal usual quantitative scientific language discussions but yet pure a philosophical one with strengthening my understanding interpretations of consciousness along with reading about these definitions: it would be an interesting reading. and made me interested to consciousness and will topics again whilst i lost interest before. ok any text that has philosophical language makes me interested to its topic i think i guess. and could be sociology's way of talk either. when they tell a topic with such language, it becomes totally severely interesting i think. maybe because i think like that is because has conjunctions to the topics i left reading about left in the middle like consciousness and will. maybe that text i last read those topics weren't having this much definitive this much wide scope that halted that readings but definitely it became again interesting to read about consciousness and will even through this psychoanalysis topic which i thought i weren't interested about. i guess i am still not very interested to psychoanalysis but its mere intersections dependencies with consciousness and will area makes it some topic very interesting to read about. my first reflections of this text that merges philosophy and psychoanalysis is that, looks they did it very professionally.  and makes one to want to consume all information in this text once. but impossible. i need to spread this reading to various days. ok back to work now. if i had 10 hours or less i don't know i would had consumed this text's all information right now. but need to return to work now. and also need to spread to days. i just don't know but even if i don't like psychoanalysis topic this texts philosophical language made it severely interesting to read about.  I always wondered about Husserl also. and also introduces Husserl's ideas little bit. 

ok back to work now. 

one observation: 

this having 10 fingers status to constant 10 number usage.  i am not a perfect coder, i mean i am not a perfect binary person i think (since coders minds work  not  not 10 and times of 10 but 2 :)    not yet a very good coder other else i would move from my fingers count to transistors status counts.)