This weekend is with fun/enthusiasm of  of Nlp/linguistics and some nn trainings and some knowledge engineering revising / ontology frameworks revising.

Tonight specifically:

 philosophy of linguistics revising from awesome Stanford uni's philosophy page notes. 

Tonight revising nlp topics after that. Tomorrow some Bert trainings etc and in tandem continuing math readings to devise bnfs ontologies/inference dB 

Very fun weekend: ai hackathon. To come up to some phase in mvp of non_lazy_guh_

 

 

hey it would help me also build that viewer webgl app also :) i would instruct guh_ to learn to code graphics shaders. its so fun to build an ai- hybrid stuff of ai/knowledge engineering topics/maths ontologies/inference dbs/inference mechanisms.

ok lets not get lost in blogging and lets open awesome philosophy notes from Stanford to get back to linguistics readings/revising. 

ok hadnt read this linguistic relativism section and now reading. then would continue the main page.

ok i have also thought language would be the core component of an ai.

as i read about language relativisim now.

that it has a normative relativism factor and is the basis how perception/thinking happens. 

but i might be wrong surely. but to me my ai building methodology also puts NLP and linguistics in the center of thinking mechanism. 

i dont know if linguistic relativism that necessitates langauge being the eyes of perception and guidance of thought is true but i also even without reading about this topic inherently wanted to build my ai in same perspective without giving enough effort investment for querying if its a correct approach or not. I like doing this, investing to a methodology with just inner feeling but without any clear enough effort given to decide the methodology in some cases and this be such cases. I have no idea if my ai building methodology is correct. But to me this method seems to be the go way, i feel like that from my subconscious side that the ai hybrid system's is following linguistic relativism in the sense it puts language to center of every topic of the hybrid system.  It might not be a correct approach but i want to go like this since there afre no constraints like to perpetuate a technical decision meeting process with well provided effort for every  decision of this hobby project. some decisions to be done based on just feeling of wanting to design like that. but not with any decision process with some effort investment.

 

i am so happy to find this encylopedia of Stanford cause it enables me to learn about thoughtscapes for these topics and covering also possible inference mechanisms and different modes of inference. with somehow conceptualization or framework building notion underlyingly.  It would help alot in defining my own taxonomies/ontologies for this centric NLP part of this hybrid system.(which is called non_lazy_guh_ ) 

as i always discover i am everytime in love to reading humanities articles and this systematic conceptualizations/discussions/disputes all along. Had stopped reading for a while but whilst reading this i remember how much i loved reading such systematic framework building efforts on this type of matters.

 

ok came up to section of "A Taxonomy of positions" section. 

 :)

 

 this encylopedia is so awesome💜 and made me remembered i liked reading these type of topics alot (before).

 

and its so fun to consume this information set to build my ai's design :)

 

building an ai is so fun :)  

i dont know if its kind of egocentric to call my ai as guh_
i bvuild it using the collective information humanity created but just me being the integrator of possible knowledges i would read/revise all along. So it would be wrong to follow any egocentric approach in such case since i just do create not much but actually utilize, depend on, what awesome information other people created in different fields/areas like this reading for instance. every page alters some design constraint of the to be built ai. 

 

but i guess this initial study really impacts many and most core design decisions. i mean this linguistics and philosophy of linguistics study specifically the latter one.

 

 

 

 

---------------------------------------------------

 

 meanwhile:

 

 

i saw a coincidence with a very very very awesome/amazing woman politician's word very newly and i wanted to state indefinite insurmountable cheers/respects from my blog :)

-----------------------------------------------------

 

 

ok continueing the reading yupp.