hmm i learnt about ionic bonding beside  hybridization /covalent type boinds and this were important for charged / polarization dipoles in such configurations. 

learnt about chemistry also beside just some only wikipedia based readings to get to know atomic world reactions. to understand how nanobots could be formed. i figured out i need to buy a chemistry molecular chemistry textbook or study to an online one. there this world of polarization / ionic bonding quite alot passes and learnt how ATP to ADP stores energy, actually just knew that ATP/ADP are converted to each in mitochondria i mean ADP to ATP happens in mitochondria right? if i dont remember wrong. i learnt how its like that slightly and understood these energy reactions. So i understood based on the periodic table, we can infer some reactions which are usually considered in taxonomy of chemistry already,e.g. bases or hydrolysis or many taxonomy definition of there, are actually forming  deforming of both covalent and ionic bonds itself. 

So i understood in this project, i might need to go over molecular chemistry .(in this nanotechnology project) because in the end, such pre known knowldge from there could be used as base example cases to when building investigating nanobots designs with reinforcement learning. but i believe what nature already holds (e.g. ADP-ATP conversion) is just a beginning. we could do better than that with new designs with generative design concept. 

hmm figured out how much i were ignorant in molecular chemistry as reading about.  :) i had no idea chemical reactions are happening with hybridization or valence shell electrons transfers or ionic bonding type behaviors. also learning more about electric dipole moment in this distribution. but feels like i also need to start to learn after or during particle physics beside. 

but until then, i believe this easy to deploy simulator is even with my huge ignorance in molecular chemistry and particle physics, is possible goal. I need to understand patterns i wish the system to discover. some patterns might be like creating torque in a molecule and rotational vibration due to that, and that charged part of the rotating part also transfers this polarization to other vicinity atoms.

or similarly, again with charged atoms in molecules, in an ionic molecule, its bonding binding related alterations or could it be used to for instance, to carry one atom specifically one then move it at some point with altering its charge  either through radiation or electron phasers/shooters, i mean using some nanobots such molecules and changving their configuration to bind them then leave those binded molecules in some place, and also altering their rotation movement etc with magnetic fields, to move thenm as we want and to build move atoms from somewher eto other, and figuring out how to bond them iteratively to in the end to construct a polymer or monomer consisting of molecules and molecules also being very complex. So to figure out how to first create molecules and doing it in phase by phase type construction it could happen to have, but during this, its not expected to construct molecules like a linear additive stages, it could be temporarily added new bonds that would be unbonded later, i mean we its not expected to bond just looking to how nature create molecules, but using the capabilities of reinforcement learning or genetic programming like approaches, to build new methods. but most possibly nature already might hold every such combination? i dont think so, it wouldnt be alike controlled process wise manufacturing of molecules in nature. even if nature's own mechanisms are improvisation point, e.g. to store to be able to store energy in ATP to ADP conversion.

i never been interested to chemistry science unfortunately. but i have to learn awhile visibly to some level at least.  but somehow its not my interst area that much,. but surely would have been cool toget to know some jargon of/classifications/taxonomies of. 

if in futute we want to see our dna's with particle physics tech and then code it heal mutations on it via nanobots, we need to excel this molecular engineering i guess very mcuh and create factory workers of nanobots through ai technologies. and at the same time when dna could be visualized (nonintrusively) some how via a particle physics methodology that you could control nanometer resolutions that which would be somehow reflected on some surface to give us an image, and that such particle physics systems thrown particles should be not unhealthy and low energy and should be going to distances that are changing nanometer in its resolution or even less to be able to scan those images of dna/rnas or cell mattes cell molecules, atoms, we might then control nanobots to move there to heal mutation if mutation happens, or add new telomere part stitch new telomere part, or fix the broken molecules of the cell. or fix cancerous cells. 

such technology might be fastly invented wishfully by coder ai afterthat it would learn particle physics. 

so that we could have such systems where nanobots construct reconstruct cells/dna/rna/repairs e.g. it could be such medical device that you enter and have nanobots infused that you spare time there and it repairs dna/rna /cells in your body awhile. it would be aweomse if this were persitently present tech in space ships, that you dont have to stay in a place to do that. that your body might include some added tech that already holds this particle physics dna/rna/cell damage scanner. that this might constantly happen then. so such technology not only needs to be invented and should also be invented mobile versions of. that you wont have routine renweing/repairing cycles (i remembered now one concept from star trek but that were unnice concept surely of course it wouldnt be any like that :) ) 

it should be not only mobile tech that is integrated to body, but also be easy to replenish change in case of failure. then eternality living to forever might happen in such case whihc would be aweome i think. if we repair dna/rna/telomeres/cell molecules of any, then we live to forever. which would had been awesome. 

so i guess in future blood would not be just blood, but blood plus nanobots stream and with integrated devices that manages the nanobots in the body. we would have maybe our bloods would be mainly even replaced by nanobots stream and very little left(like 10% of original blood mixture) from original blood type fluid mixture. i believe so. 

ok lets try to continue to project and then continue coder ai project later cause coder ai is necessary to buidl these devices which if i wanted to build, wont fit to my life time to build nor maybe even wont fit to 2 centuries or more. building it fast passes from delegating it to coder ai. so lets later spare more time to topology study to continue to coder ai project, as its very important project to my understanding since would inventions would be delegated to it. 

so my initial  nanobot study to print salad completely and with slightly more vitamins would not be intelligent in carteisan type but would have nominalistic intelligence, it would have intelligence of either reinforcement learning type generative design. . iut woldnt any be carteisan type intelluigence. 

i think nanometer wise scattering of a particle from such device or a particle beam(or wave) (that is not high energy) to maybe also correspondingly reflected another beam of another particle that they when intersect turn ot another partilce that which interacts with the atoms there creating some image on a scanner from these such integrated edvices in body then to with high speed network to share with quantum computers or high performance comptuers to analyze dna data to invesitgate it then at the same time if there is a problem, sending of nanobots to there and do a specific functionality again with beams directions. so it would be very very complicated technology type to invent. i myself wouldnt be able to invetn in many centuries i guess. but i believe coder ai might be able to invent. these integrated devices design and their particle physics mechanism to throw a particle to a point that is known very concretely position of. or a collected positioning system of integrated devices that they have own their own relative frames but a general common frame also. that nanobtos would be used by another integrated device type. could be also external if its not possible to device these devices internally,. then like borgs humans would have to enter some stuff for a while whilst nanobots are repariing all cells/dna/rnas. but it would be better to have them stationary inside body imho to have persistent rebuilding reparing effort. of course people wouldnt be any like borgs.  but technology only, only technology would  resemble. 

so initial nanobots proejct's complxity would be very trivial wtr to these following later projects that would be delegated to coder ai. 

we already have nanobots e.g. tcells. but its the original design. and it does not fix telomeres when degrades and it does not orioginal nanobots of body does not provide living to forever functionality.

so i believe its better to replace our blood with a new nanobots stream capable of such advanced functionality in future. of course for people interested. it would be optional basic right that you mgiht choose or not choose if you dont like. 

========================