yayyy fun of topology language grammar design starts whilst during the topology revisiting study. 

I know my initial topology grammar design might be stupidly designed since i am not a maths expert. so i anticipate the grammar i design would not be very well designed. 

but it would work to be defined inference sql engine later whether designed well or not.  

yayyy after some such lack of courage reflecting sentences for status quo in topology grammar design in above paragraph, lets attend this topology grammar design task whilst in tandem revising topology knowledge from this bsc topology topics book. (its not even phd phd topology topics I had left that before maybe a year ago and had not continued yet). 

there many times at poitns I lack courage or reflect lack of self confidence in my capability of accomplishing ai project's  tasks. like in very first paragraphs which i reflected my inconfidence in topology grammar task.  but i would design but it wont be like if anyone very expert in topology have had designed. but that does not matter alot. what matters is it to be work/as an inherent representation capability to ai. to generalize also with topology layers.  and surely an sql like query language to topological maths language based rdf /grammar would also be written. 

hmm maybe later months it might be better. when i finish phd topology studies phd books by then. but current version of topology grammar would be silly. not very well designed i mean. wouldnt be like a phd grammar project any. cause i dont know maths yet in phd level since i gave a break to studying phd books in these topics 1 year ago or so. I even forgot some of bsc level knowledge either that i  am revising now from a bsc topology book.

so i dont care that my grammar design for topology language would be silly initially. i know it would be silly now but later it would be better designed after i continue phd topics studies in these topology topics.

 i mean i think language redesign/optimizations/updates to topology grammar might routinely happen after initial 0.1 ai is released. but in 0.1 version an initial silly type topology language grammar would be crafted. and i dont care that it would be a silly topology language. I dont care that i currently lack the expertise to write a very well formed topology language at this point. such concern is not 0.1 ai version concerns. but such math language/topology language updates would be main focus of 0.2 /0.3 design versions. currently perfectionism to the to be devised grammar is of least concern among 0.1 version's tasks. but it would be important in 0.2 and 0.3 tasks I would resume studying to phd books by then in that part of the study after this bulk coding part bulk software engineering part of project studies ends, then i would refocus on grammar side and would resume phd books to extend/optimize grammar. 

0.1 is more about bulk software engineering. not theoretic studies focused but it would be contrasting to that in 0.2 and 0.3 versions. 0.2 and 0.3 versions would be very attentively very studiedly designed for topology grammar updates/optimizations even with redesigns maybe. so in brief, i dont care that 0.1 version's topology grammar would be silly. currently there is no time to study to phd topology books in this first design /build iteration for 0.1 version. currently time is spared to bulk software engineering/big data engineering /ontology engineering and machine learning engineering tasks for 0.1 version to be completed/to define initial design/implementation.  but then in 0.2's implementation, there would be time to study to topology phd books. and update grammars  when if necessary.