Yep today continues with studying to topoi book. the most unsuccesful case of to required to study book I had not finished in time yet.  but wishfully I could finish by tomorrow i think. and resume flink coding on friday. then to iterate some coding studies by end of Jan. 

hmm so this both cohesive and noncohesive requirements of 5d definitely requires very very abstract math there. no kind of straightforward intuition of a cohesive domain for 5d imho possibly is my initial opinion. maybe cohesion is not a default feature of 5d but only for densified 5d sections? we dont know. so this 5d's contradictive requirements requires quite alot effort of abstract maths studying/theorizing with abstract maths. 

plus we need to be able to use various logic modules systems since actual 5d logic systems epistemological verification of theorem structure there of its proof methods even needs not be the default logic systems of classic logic either. so for epistemological verification and proof methods for axiomatics for systems of inference for 5d, it needs not to be classical. 

but that even starts from 5d space definition. i think we would might need to forget about cohesive universe perception when tackling 5d.  i mean overall 5d. hmm that the densified compact universe mixture regions might have cohesive structure but overall 5d might not have, does not have to. that we have always perceived a cohesive and linear universe do not any mean 5d is like that actually. 

So when you remove out cohesiveness requirement from a space definition of a framework, then you have lots of abstract mathematical additional possibilities in frameworks side there. I mean from generator maths logic that enables duplicating a sphere from a single sphere type maths to  any mathematical constructivist and abstraction methodology might craft various possible 5d universe versions there. its just of course not easy to perceive to our logic systems that you can redefine a sphere  to two spheres is not any easily perceivable by our defacto logic systems but thats our cohesive systems based logic systems is slightly archaic actually that is like that because of since we  live in cohesive universe experience. but does not mean 5d is any like that. So the maths of 5d might be incompatible to our default defacto logic systems but it might as well be like that. cause as its seen universe is multiverse albeit we perceive it linear, our perception of universe of it being cohesive has no guarantee that its actually cohesive in 5d. Its maybe a regimen of space time of 5d mixture of universes that somehow creates both linear universe perception along with cohesive universe perception. but it does not have to be like that originally in 5d framework but only in for instance compact universe mixture regimens, maybe its cohesive but maybe in 5d in overall maybe its not. 

but these are all empty talks unless formulated by ml algos. since i mean unless we conceptualize with formal systems, its just empty talking but with no frameworks to define 5d universe system etc. its just useless talk until we have build some tools alike ml algos to do this abstract maths very fluently. I mean without definite exact formulations its all blabbering empty talk. we need to asap build the formal systems definitions/conceptualizations to define 5d theorems and to test and create warp devices warp crafts.  

I can endlessly blabber about this topic endlessly but without actual building/crafting formal systems and theorems with those, I would had accomplished nothing to build warp tech. Although its nice to share our ideas in blog, I sometimes spare over time to blogging whilst i need to study to topos. since as mentioned I like talking these topics too much. i mean 5d universe and possible theorem systems and how we could build the necessary formal systems there? we yet not invented nor know any. but i usually spare alot time to talking on these field without any beneficial theorem building activity. I mean ok its nice to share my theorem ideas but its useless since I mean it requires very correct complete formalization/conceptualization effort to define any 5d theorem its not any about blabbering ideas with classical logic systems based thought patterns to try to define 5d universe system,. without proper formal system definitions its not any useful study. we need to define exact proper formal systems/conceptualizations to define 5d first although its fun to blog about ideas of 5d its not very useful blabbering since it does not have any formal system definition yet. I mean these topics require very proper conceptualization/formal systems definitions to then via those to craft the definite 5d universe definition theorems with such proper formal systems definitions alike. 

So I think I should reduce time to blogging and try to focus finish studying to abstract maths first this topoi topic then later also second abstract maths topic in next month whilst at the same time coding ml algos project. 

yep lets task myself with iterate as much as possible to finish studying this topoi book task now then lets see what i accomplish on today and tomorrow in this topoi task. wishfully i nearly complete this task on tomorrow. 

but i wished i had studied maths and physics in bsc and but then i had would lack coding skill. hmm then i wish i had done an msc before in maths and physics  which would really helped me now in developing this warp project. but nevertheless i would finalize getting some what proficient in abstract maths by recently so not that severe issue that i had not done maths msc or physics msc but surely would had been better if i had done msc in physics and maths and i think would really helped reduced time spared to this project.  (of inventing warp tech project yep ) (specifically i wish very before i did some msc phd of abstract maths before. very regretted i had not done since abstract maths is very required knowledge to build warp technology.  )  (i think 5d is domain where you forget the default CL systems (classic logic) and classic maths either to define that contradictive requirements having dimension's frameworks (of 5d's theorems) )