hey been watching physics introduction videos from verisatum than had more ideas about multiverse topic and probability concept of lenz equations connection to multiverse. it made me understand theirs perspective why universe is perceived as linear. 

so the end sheave of neuron in a boltzman distributed system, let it be one neuron in mind (not as boltzmann brain analogy but as distributed systems logic),  the sheaves of its trees that makes it receive one signal of neural pathway. from many possible configurations in that lenz system, and even in past and future universes (think alike string theorist's analogical thought experiment of dimensions concept) that sheaves connected to even 1966's star trek tv show versions/configurations, being connected to  brain's engrams formation (of neural pathways setup system) hmm  I just try to understand with analogies of  light, (as light follows the least action principle as learnt i mean the interference pattern of its multi existence) of how in that case the phase system there setups a linearly perceived engrams creating iteration.

if memories in brain are repeating neural pathways constantly, then,  we can think it as a nonmemory store brain of possible dissemination of neural connection to any direction any connection direction right? 

so neural pathways are kind of lessening of that possibilities of directions of neural connections in default case of every possible direction case.

so i still am thinking on this topic. i mean how could least action seen in light example could be also working in this case in sheave of neural pathway whihc is even connected to multiverse's one possible 1966 star trek episode alike. 

I newly listened these physics introduction lectures of to learn about this unified perspective that connects various physics frameworks (but which is not still as learnt a unified theory either) 

hmm so possibly the multiverse universes also creates engrams in our;s minds alike lights interference pattern in double slit or triple slit thought experment. alike initial idea I had setup. 

I mean the engrams in mind of neural path ways are some how like least action happenstance. 

but how? 

I mean this is just very layman wise thinking. I mean very roughly very crudely. I mean still gives no evidence why universe does not glitch from one neural path way engram to another with instable engrams.  so very much layman thinking yet.

but the thing is -> :D there is this silly aspect also --> :D one can never be sure that -> here comes the funny aspect -> what if actually it switches alot. but we are like this time comes boltzman brain analogy.  I mean what if my mind lives in a constant changes of universes but everytime in a silence of action it thinks as if its engrams are from a stable nonglitches having universe :D

i mean misperception that glitches do not happen. I mean boltzman brain condition :D that brain have no idea its just happent instanteneously to that config and thinks misperceives as it comes from a linear iterating universe :D

that is not impossible :D

in this thought experiemnts of yet layman wise analysis of multiverse travels concept, I repetitively come to possibility of "what if we are like boltzman brains? that universe changes are actually not any slightly stable nor to be linearly perceived as much (that there happens very strange glitches) but we dont perceive since at each time we find our selves in a boltzman brain condition which has engrams for that universe change set. I mean we think universe do not have abrupt very strange glitches whilst it has, since any instant the engrams of boltzman brain have somehow due to some undeciphered thing have least action principle like stuff happening. but meanwhile, let me exemplify, meanwhile in a moment to another moment its a flux of e.g. abrupt changes of universes. where engrams (neural pathways) constantly alter.  but at a single moment we perceive the moment only (0 quanta moment where no action happens (silence of time iterations (i mean moments of silence of no time change, time in thermodynamics meanings i mean I consider time iteration as change of state in such thought experiment) )

this has been always a conundrum, that why we dont have abrupt change of universes than that we have engrams of -> e.g. moment 1 -> aha this universe moment 2 comes after a second -> gosh this engram I have does not match up with this universe version?? what the ****? 

in a multiverse case, we would have expect with layman wise thinking, such glitches to have happen. since then brain should be able to interface to many universes and sometimes with even some glitches conditions. 

but than posisbly something in engram and lenz equations system there, has some property that for boltzman brain moment a (a moment of silence of time), the brain thinks its as if has engrams  of a linear iterating universe. then if glitch happens, it might capture the glitch, but somehow glitches also then do not very happen right possibly? hmm. so again least action might have something with that.

so my initial some findings without this new perspective also matches up with this least action framework I listened. since I also thought probability cluster is that much dense that it iterates in that single direction. i mean densifying of universe versions. 

so here we then query,  what is in my mind different that i have countered this phenomena significantly? 

or maybe everyone counters but they do not detect by their attention since they have zero attention to multiverse topics (maybe, possibly).  dunno. 

but what could be different in me would be autism, that we have less pruning, more dense synapse system as far as I know. than that might create the case of more vicinity neural pathways to induce some phase dominance of whatever phase that lenz system might have of its ion flow possible configurations of many configurations at once. 

just speculating ->

maybe in nonautist people this is observed less frequently since they have excess pruning of neural pathways so that the vicinity synapse having multiple synapses concept to them is not very much existing or not very much frequently existing.

but this is just a speculation. not any fact. i mean maybe nonautist people also observe this phenomena as frequently as we autist people. we just dunno. 

but than autism would mean a significant advantage in evolution (i mean the genetic disorder which results in absence of pruning of synapses :D normally in some period, nonautists brains  synapses gets pruned by some molecular mechanism. but its theorized that in genetic versions of autism, that molecular stuff do not happen thereby pruning of synapses does not happen that then happens excess synapse density) in most cases it reduces alot standard sapiens skills (e.g. muscle coordinationskills or social skills) but then it gives chance of phasing skill possibly due to denser synapse density. :D -> yet a moment to again be happy to be an autist. :D

ok ok this is just silly thinking :D -> I mean maybe this phenomena also happens frequently to nonautist people.  maybe has no relatedness to autism although I do tried to connect to autism, there is yet no evidence.

but there we have some initial very silly layman idea (not any topological nor any space framework wise valid thought yet) that it might be because of multiple pathways that are very vicinity in similar configuration. 

but maybe its not any like that. this has no yet any founded logic nor scientific thought based model of lenz systems possible any how any dynamics there. this is just layman thinking currently.   I just only wondered if this topic that much significantly happening in my engrams (when watching star trek) is somehow anyhow related to autism topic. and just only speculated on that aspect.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

so again, it must be kind  of imho easy to device even some basic multiverse traveling craft. if only we connect a person inside  some kind of nonconnected to crafts' outer side. then connect to signals from craft and those signals are generated  by some quantum system of possible e.g. alike mind, lenz configurations then the person inside could with alteirng the state of lenz system of the craft from inside, might make it travel in multiverse imho. in crudest such concept idea. 

this might be very possible with imho quantum computers since they directly are programmable quantum systems. so one can create a multiverse traveling craft with possibly a programmable quantum computer i think. yep. 

i mean in conceptual idea wise in layman thinking wise, it makes sense. but the design of multiverse craft would be designed with some generic maths category theoretical maths where even topology various versions are checked tested, which even geometry concepts comes from abstract maths side of category theoretic basics of maths. i mean do not anticipate some outer shell having craft idea just instantly. even that comes to mind as layman wise thinking wise (yep it also came to my mind as such idea initially) in more generic maths, science and material science is not anymore the usual science methods. I mean in domain of tarski banach and lawvere, and domain of quanta, I would just say, lets forget all we know of even topology when we analytically reconstruct various possible frameworks for it.  from different space definitions systems either. 

I mean do not for a second confuse me as if i would devise the multiverse craft with layman methods albeit currently i am talking of layman wise on this topic. its when we come to doing maths topic, we would do some most generic form of maths. not the usual maths. (some most abstract) 

so do not misperceive as if this project of multiverses and warp ideas depend on layman concepts. do not layman talks in my blog on this matter even confuse you for a second on that. from the start of this project of ml algos, we thrown out usual maths. I mean without doing philosophical thought methodologies in maths (which mathematicians already does for a significantly long time) we do not go anywhere that is interesting even in our multiverse travel craft design. i mean it does not go anything fun type engineering. but standard boring engineering if we would had followed standard applied maths methods. nah thats not for the creatives with philosophical aspects.  I mean maybe applied maths might also create a multiverse craft idea/concept design which works efficiently. but thats not of our interest. not any interesting project if we dont do interesting (abstract) type maths i mean. i mean we wish to throw away usual maths since its too boring and unphilosophical. mathematicians have long time  did started philosophical methods in  maths and abstract side. we newly learnt about whilst reading of abstract maths.  i mean the abstract side long before existed. which we got ourselves curious to ourselves and figured out there is a universe of abstract maths there already crafted by maths science that we had before not yet acquinted to before. I mean i had a drift to abstract maths myself of had an affinity to get curious to that, and figured out there is an entire universe of abstract maths already i mean maths people had created alot iterations in abstract maths topics (that we newly got some what slightest acquinted to) 

so even if i might do talk of science layman wise, do not confuse me for a second as a layman. I just dont like sparing my time to do  science with usual maths. I would rather prefer most abstract form of maths (with crafting ml algos tool  for that.) 

I mean the lack of me babbling about formulas etc is not just because I am a layman (although i am actually to admit still yet  very much a layman in basic knowledge of science still of course), I just dont have interest to formulas there. I would rather go start from abstract maths side to those topics. with throwing every framework before reconstructing it. 

its just the default science applied methods are sometimes boring to creative people i mean. so its not a thing to confuse then creative people as layman in science then. it just means they are not interested to spare time to that but they might go some more  smart and more abstract methodologies there and then. 

 ------------------------------------------------------------