this were the lecture i listened to: 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qJZ1Ez28C-A

I mean lecture mentioning of light following all paths at once and that least action creates probability of in vicinity of some paths much higher.  

this gave me some approval of my initial idea of dense universe mixtures (for linear perception of universe mixture of multiverse, alike same wise we perceive light as linear in most cases whilst its not)

(some funny idea popped up -> for end of this video there is some experiment of light regards to that, in reference to that :D -> here comes the funny idea  -> maybe there is a (benign alien type, not the malign align types) caspar thats also doing placing some placard to universe to have universe glitches happent to star trek tv shows we watch.  why not so? )

let me tell me again such coincidence -> I told of to some quantum computer's strange behaviour hear say (some hear say only) as I would only believe to if i see it.  

then in one star trek I watched, the captain said -> I would only believe it if its done/accomplished. :D

ok this is not a rare coincidence. but still one sometimes can not stop thinking what if really nonmalign aliens have something with star trek topic.  its like as if a timeless nonmalign benign alien talking from star trek universe :D but most possibly its the least action principle somehow alike light multiverse universe mixture probability density somehow densifies in some type to have such coincidence with lenz system happen. but still, there still the possibility that actually its some funny nonmalign alien civilization altering slight a bit multiverse mixture here and there to help us invent multiverse technologies maybe. I mean an alien caspar version :D (as caspar experiments with light end of this lecture video :D in the multiverse is alike light (I mean it can have all values at once alike light can follow all paths at once and I mean follows actually in default)  

ok thats not the dominant possibility imho. its most possibly something happens natural. not nonmalign aliens multiverse region interference. 

so i am very happy to figure out my initial idea of very dense universe probability mixture paths is also some expected thing to happen in science frameworks side. (I mean in light for instance) 

so from different backgrounds (I from layman background in to this science field (yet layman i meant, I am following some alternate approach of building my own(DIY) maths to study and invent things in this topics, since i find the nonphilosophical maths (usually used in default science) kind of boring-hard to follow due to boredom. since there this and that there is now the more interesting abstract math philosophical maths domain so how could one then continue follow original nonphilosophcal maths in such case. its impossible to then not follow DIY maths versions of abstract maths type(philosophical maths types)) ) I came up to similar idea which turns out that its a commonly to come up to idea in the end. (I mean type logical idea) 

-> for we engineers wanting to reconstruct radio our selves tye of trait -> (we can see in my fixation to do my own DIY maths to do science/invent things) there is a funny caricature of this engineer trait -> although i never had reconstructed a radio or interested to do,  i couldnt find but there were a funny dilbert caricautre about such engineering trait:D couldnt find it.  

I saw such attitude of myself against maths. i mean wanting to break science frameworks and reconstruct. we engineers are like dilbert comics imho  :D

some funny talk now -> 

if you had missed it, I am trying to do some form of DIY maths in ml algos project :D (I mean crafting maths with abstract maths and actually philosophical wise thought version of maths) 

I mean in brief, DIY maths version :D  (I mean to reconstruct scientific theorems here and there later with abstract maths methodologies)  (actually not single version, the intend is to craft many versions, intuitionistic maths approach alike interchangeable logic systems alike.) 

how when such very interesting topics exist, like nonriemann integrals/measure theory/banach tarski paradoxes, one how one could follow the default classical maths with theorems axioms and riemann integral based science afterwards or flux etc like theorems, but then its just too uninteresting such type of science to we engineers side. we wish to see DIY math versions alike maths science has been crafting for a significant awhile. I mean how could one do use Riemann integral in engineering as an engineering projects when there is much more interesting discussions there and then in analysis topics and nonriemann integral based measure theory topics. I mean how could one not follow methods of grp theoretic methods in various fields instead of default lie grps based differential equation systems solutions. I mean how one can not think of optimization of grp theoretic methods automatedly. with even taking inspiration from cellular automata concepts :) I mean to us like engineers, classical maths is just too severely boring to even try to do science with it, honestly. so do not consider we engineers as layman just we do currently  science layman wise. its just we are in process of building our automated math versions/DIY math versions to do science. its just the default classical maths is just too boring to we engineers imho. of course due to that boredom, we are yet still in layman condition to various science knowledge we have to admit that. but its not just we would keep stay layman. on the contrary, we engineers are hardworking to design our DIY math versions to do science. but still we many times get jealous of people whom are fluent in science methods which we lack since we find it boring.  I  mean people whom spared time and got fluent in some science knowledge we are always jealous of. but its that it just seems like nonanalytical approach to do that and spare time. whilst there is this edge of science methods like abstract maths here and there. why not follow the edge of science methods I mean instead following the classical science methods? plus i dont have computer type mind, I might be less efficient in fluency in some science methods also. (yep been always jealous of genius scientist type mind types that I lack myself) but thats what its. we are not genius scientists type minds. but engineers. yep. (yep we engineers always have jealousy to genius type scientist people. or people very fluent with scientific methods. since we dont have computer like minds alike genius scientists. we lack such inherent fluency. nevertheless so we engineers have funnily a never ending jealousy against the genius scientist type brethren which we make fun of our such aspect in blog many times :D (e.g. jealousy to Von Neuman references  or jealousy to people whom are innately fluent in science :D) we noncomputer type engineers have constant jealousy to such science people with innate such fluency (which usually most times scientists type brethren have, e.g. physicists or other science fields. ). which we lack. :D) 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

its so funny.  of how we engineers do craft engineering projects :D -> e.g. unlike most dormant engineering methods -> 

we completely threw away usual classical maths away even 3 years ago in start of ml algos project. :D we are pursueing DIY maths version in our ml project :D of course not a straightforward challenge/path. but i can followed no else path :D. I mean when there is this and there abstract math knowledge/paradigms, how could one then even later once look back to classical maths methods ever once afterwards? nah.  

still learning maths by then whilst trying to design project which i iterated alot design of. but had not yet finished topos study. and had not yet finished enough category theory expertise gathering.  but after that I can resume the NLP translation tasks for ml algos project to pursue funnily one 2 centuries ago linguistics approach :D (Yep not all design principles of ml algos is contemporary. it even has a medieval times linguistics approach type design principle very funnily :D (I mean semantics via maths type linguistics approach/concept, which were abondoned after medieval period :D )  

nevertheless end of such funny talk as of now. now lets resume the game dev project (to fund ml algos project with that later :D)

yep I iterated somewhat with inventory design. with following some tab widget tutorial then now today I would add drag-drop between widgets (of inventory types) then if this finishes today, then tomorrow some PCG plugin and some ai scripts addition with PCG alike.  then the basic game logic (without crafting and portalling) would be partially ready for initial planet of 3954th planet.