time to again resist untrue propaganda attacks this time of my religion i saw untrue propaganda attack to (unknown neo nazi foreign elite's spectre articulated this time religious terrst grp to do false flag-untrue propaganda if not misdetection) ->so lets promote my religion of atheism in my blog with ->

(neo nazi unknown foreign elite person attempts various types of very maniacal (impossible) untrue propaganda attacks:S  ) 

 I decided to promote atheism in blog. (upon seeing untrue propaganda attack also to my religion of atheism) 

yep today's atheism discussion starts with  ->

people, long before any of main religions, there existed thousand many religions in world. 

its a human psychologic situation to wish to find a greater meaning/answer to queries of mind.but that queries existing does not mean the existence of a creator any at all.

but lets start with now a different aspect -> some bold theory -> bicameral theory of human evolution.

this is a theory but unproved, but provides an idea of how God idea emerged in humans evolution. 

it states that, long before, we had bicameral mind structure. where there were 2 minds, one is ego, one is super ego alike schism it defines, and says that the God's voice were actually the other cameral mind's long evolutionary history forgotten tradition.

we started our atheist discussion with this interesting theory of How God idea ever came to be popular with humans? 

Bicameral mentality - Wikipedia

if this theory were correct, here is where all God idea came out from!

no no just joking. there is no simple answer to anthropological cultural evolution queries (e.g, where fallacious God concept ever happent in human cultures ever  type query) 

anthropological studies never ever awaits one simple answer to cultural evolution concepts (e.g God concepts, which we atheists favor to find unbelievable unlike religious people) 

but this seems quite one possible how God idea came from.

but this might not be the only reason/how God concept ever developed in human's cultural evolution path. (no do not misunderstand we atheists do not any mean any we are culturally more evolved than people with God belief of all religions. we are not any type of any idiots that does discrimination based on beliefs/lack of beliefs )

 

to my anthropological side, I believe seeing how the anthropology sociology ontology layers work out in human cultures all along (with individual psychology being last ontology layer of gigantic sociologic cultural evolution processes along human speices and sociological belief system processes in upper layers of such cultural processes in sample populaces among human populaces) 

unlike Foucault which created an intellectual evolution of human speices "in order of things" based on mind only, lets develop now a secondary intellectual criterion of human speices with not just individual mind but entire sociologic processes of anthropologic cultural evolution concept.

----> 

lets came up to the idea that->

if bicameral theory were correct (seems very logical and possible to be correct),  its then alike in Foucault's analysis of human mind's intellectual evolution in "order of things" book, whilst we are not any intellect alike Foucault, with our amateur intellect side, lets do a secondary intellectual path of humans analysis but not alike Foucault (not focusing to individual mind but to the cultural evolution process/its sociological processes itself) --->

so then, if 3000 years ago, human mind were bicameral (some time where full consciousness concept has not been concept wise developed ) then the time after, when humans invented full consciousness concept in 3000-2500 years ago or so, we would tag such leap of human intellectual path as time where humans invented full conscious mode of their minds.  but this is no topic of individual minds, its rather sociological processes we are talking of in this topic. I mean current state of humans were as of invented 3000-2500 years ago, as humans switched from bicameral to full conscious mind mode, with them moving religions concept to this time a more external concept (out of their own minds) but still strong influence in their sociological processes in their cultural evolution, with moving religion from inside minds to sociological upper processes of their cultural mechanisms,  and developing inventing full consciousness concept and a harmony of their minds, but meanwhile pushing outside the previous notion of God (voices in head,) to their sociological processes upper layer, they created meanwhile single God religions after such period. of a desire to push god concept to outside of mind (from psychology=individual thinking device ontology layer of anthropological processes to upper ontology layers where religion/god concept itself becomes a virtual process in upper anthropology sociological process layers) , so this intellectual leap 3000-2500 years ago,  leap from bicameral mind to harmonious mind concept and moving voices in head to upper ontology layers sociological layers type anthropological wise inventions humanities followed, with their biggest invention of becoming fully conscious. (leap from bicameral to harmonious(fully conscious) mind).

i then in this foucault's similitude intellectual path of humanity analysis study (althought not being 0.0001 % intellect of foucault, but just due to amateur curiosity to these anthropology cultural topics and just because I wanted to start talking promoting atheist topics in my blog) 

but then here we are in same intellectual level last 3000 years after on. 

I mean the religion and God concept being in upper anthropology sociology processes/mechanisms.

and this does not mean God exists any.  it just means the current time religions are reflections of humans 3000 years ago intellectual leap to gathering full consciousness notion to their concepts/inventing such concept and pushing out God concept to a out of mind location but still interwined with mind to upper sociology process layers of sociological processes/mechanisms running in cultural evolution paths of humans. 

I mean i think the secondary consciousness level there exists -> 

this time leap from this 3000 years consciousness sociological model to a new consciousness type.

which is ->

where one understands that the sociological processes anthropological cultural evolution processes in human societies all around are also alike mind. but upper ontology  layers. right? 

i mean then religions or beliefs become big minds with its neurons being alike individual people alike analogy we can provide to this virtual mind concept. 

ok?

so as humanity in first leap moved God concept from internal mind to upper ontology layers, entered this last 3000 years happenign stage.

but then, the notion that God actually does not exist, but is a collective notion/belief system, to get aware of this is what we atheists believe to. 

i mean consciousness that God concept is actually a sociological process in upper ontology layers. 

not that God exists nor ever existed. 

so enlightening mind starts with -> learning sociology science and understanding process concept in sociology  layers. to then have gain introspection skills to analyze these sociological virtual processes in  human populaces.

now lets came upon of why this and that happent in this time period analysis (Foucaultian analysis ) of invention of harmonious mind concept 3000 years ago and moving of religion/god to outside upper ontology layers (outside of mind) have ever happent?

do you think it that happent just like that itself 3000 years ago? alienated/isolated from such era period? or why it did not happent 1000 years earlier or later?

there is the because section now comes, of humans full consciousness concept invention 3000 years ago ->

i

so coming back to now this how query of how humans and when and why invented their full consciousness concept 3000 years ago.  (from bicameral to harmonious mind notion. where this centralization invention helped humans to also create harmony concept in mind. but we dont have strong opinion on bicameral approach on this topic. 

but its seen in humanity history where cultural inventions also effect biological evolution. maybe 3000 years ago, somehow harmonious mind having people became more dominant in the populaces and moved even biological evolution that path ) 

I dont know if to believe there is some biological evolutionary correspondence to bicameral mind theory. I dont strongly believe to its biological correspondence. I mean i dont believe its biological evolution based this from bicameral to harmonious mind leap of humanity. (but thats my opinion and one can never know for sure either at the same time, but i believe human OS's computer system had not had significant biological changes in that leap in 3000 years ago. (unlike bicameral theory))  (unless we clone 3000 years ago living humans we might never know if leap from bicameral to harmonious mind is biological or sociological cultural evolution wise)

now coming back to whether its biological or not, bicameral to harmonious mind cultural invention of humanity -> we tagged this as humanity species cultural evolutions first significant iteration. 

then now here we have been in this phase entire last 3000 years i think. 

now what we believe is that .

this first leap of humanity could be analyzed in following aspect ->

gaining introspection skills to own mind. (to create self/consciousness concept and create a harmonious I concept 3000 years ago) 

so this introspection skill to own self and inventing own self period 3000 years ago -> whilst doing that, humans pushed out the God concept to upper ontology layers, ok?

then we are last 3000 years in this phase of cultural evolution. same phase ever. 

but then, 

-> the introspection skill to decipher own mind and invent a self/I concept by then-> 

its this introspection skill is again important to decipher a self concept outside this time outside mind (anthropology sociology layers)

I mean if invention of self/I concept, moving from bicameral to harmonious mind were first invention of humanity, we find following 3000 years many times people querying this time such queries to upper ontology layers of sociological processes. 

I mean the second enlightenment, we atheists believe , is now doing the same introspection to this time outer upper ontology layers. to create a more individual self concept!

I mean we atheists believe, sociology education and sociology processes education is required to awake people to this topics. that there exists minds outer minds of humans whom are not biological but sociological processes which are like virtual processes that works on human populaces. 

so sociology science education means more introspection skill to this outer minds. alike how humans invented first self/I concept 3000 years ago. (if bicameral theory were correct) then heere we are, we need to have skill to do introspect the outer mind this time (upper ontology layers minds) 

we believe reduction in insanity happens with sociology and anthropology sciences education in all humanity.  

you can see that I favor individualism, individualism is my religion. 

as mentioned even when talking of atheism, I even avoided idea of entering to an atheist groups. since I very dislike totally group and commune-community alike concepts. 

I religiously favor individualism. and  introspection skills.  

this is my belief. atheism. 

wish above blog protects my religious stance from defamation. ( since i recentlya s depicted inblognotes2 blog writings, detected even very impossible untrue propaganda attacks to my religious stance atheism so I wished to then start writing sometimes blogs promoting my religion of atheism. 

)

what i to promote to all people reading my blog -> stop being group minded first! leave any group/commune/community!  and  learn sociology/anthropology please and start seeing/introspecting sociological outer processes in humanity speices. and start asap reading sociology readings (I would suggest first readings of analytical sociology then later starting anthropology readings/listenings) 

do not be group minded! be individualistic! and start first reading analytical sociology article sets. first this one ->

hmm would later share. 

but search analytical sociology in google to start reading.

then read articles in judy brown's symbolic interactionism book. 

then start reading about anthropology science. and listen to podcast. and listen read about anthropolgoicl studies on diverse human cultures in all globe. 

then i think that might be best of how to follow atheism path! 

(so time moment when this guh decided to write some blogs promoting her religion of individualism and atheism upon seeing smearing attacks to her religion(atheism) and individualism religion)