disgusting terrsts of foreign gypsies foreign terrorst grp/cult

 hey last day i tried to fell asleep at 1:30 oclock alike. then i got fixated to thiinkiing about dimensional structure theories of multiverse. 

of with not using minkovski based thought pattern. but alternate patterns. thought and thought and thought endlessly till morning theoretical frameworks obsessedly.  yet had not came up exact initial alternate theories which i started with simplistic (topological illiterate) theories. 

hey it were not possible to fall asleep since i fixated to trying to setup my initial simplistic theorems (hmm initially thought with topology illiterate status) 

I started with some topology space theorems and thought multiverse theorems to understand the time and length dilation topics related to velocity alike. 

I mean since i want to change remove minkovski framework (nah ancient framework /incomplete) I started such initiative but then whilst thinking couldnt fall asleep and couldnt figure out an exact multiverse complete theorem yet. have some real analysis maths concepts wise initial ideas here and there. but not complete. 

for instance. I had thought of some frameworks as not as deefined by standard theorems but by frameworks I try to thought on this topics. 

hmm it were utter fun(Thereby i couldnt fall asleep) to think various alternate math abstraction methods all together from various maths fields to come up with new abstractions but i couldnt succeed yet. 

of trying to understand why time and length dilation happens . (without a minkovski thought framework there) 

i mean i am somewhere there of trying to figure out but not figured out exactly. 

we wish to invent more generic frameworks that inherently also by itself integrated to multiverse.

when during some configs of high velocity of the frame does points contract (in whatever underlying either holographic or string theoretic or same count dimensional framework) to become different config where there is point count decrease situation results in a more less points having frame or more points having frame instead which then has effect of the moving velocity having entity to be superpositioned with less or more universe versions there by e.g. from a standing still reference frame entity which does not have velocity and there time flows as if faster. and as if in faster moving velocity having object time slows down. so in standing still having object the superposition points is less or more? are the points L1? which topology? and does velocity means more points? if so more quantum hassle/interactions states among multiverse. and so, what time is actually?  so from reference frame of the standing still entity (with no speed) he sees as if the moving entity's movements itself at its frame slows down.  why then what is time? its that the fastly moving entity time frame in its self slows down in internal frame (and if to light speed slows down fully right if i remember correctly? (no time passes?) ) and physics rules in internal frame starts to work slower.  

so what if that internal frame time slowlineness is caused by actually the overclocking alike metaphorics of that it goes interface many more universe versions connected to multiverse.

so think like this,  if multiple more multiverse versions interface to the velocity having entity it even in an instant might be among many others. (interfacing to many universe versions ) at the same time. then that might have effect of time slow down (comparably to the standing still refernece frame) effect alike ->  hmm in super position alike mixture of various multiverse interfacings, in a heisenberg superposition of universe mixes of the velocity having reference frame,  both many more universe configs iterate at the same time whilst at standing still refernce less (or the reverse) then how could that make it so that clock at moving entity has clocked slower wtr to the clock of the standing still entity? when they come together they check their clolcks to see that the moving velocity having entity has had less time passed and the standing still one has more. 

so what is time? 

where how this difference is caused? is the initial quest to decipher in such framework.

 no no minkovski methods are allowed in this thought practice. -> no minkovsian frame. 

so one idea could be, in case topological point count of velocity having entity has more points wtr to nonvelocity entity -> (could be the contrary also, yet we dont know that, theory should both enable multuple modes of topological space definition ) 

so with simplistic not formulated yet method, if the velocity having item were having more point count then the immense multiverse interfacing might be something like partial adding hysteresis to the every single moment.

e.g.  if there is more eigenstates  it could move back and forth in more set of eigenstates in a looping hysteresis condition with again some nonglitch universe stability possibly but still with more hysteresis.

but since the standing still entity has less point count it has less hysteresis more strict less eigenstate changes in superposition sincec super position hs less eigenstates, and thereby with more less hysterreis movement in multiverse the clock in standing still side comparatively as if ticks faster. 

so this is one initial new perspect to time dilation concept.  of why clocks (even proved by gps satellites) clockdifferently in speed and stationary condition. 

all before new standard physics theories in post 1900s period, there were before concept of ether. which then were made invalid by new photon theorems/relativity.

but thinking maybe ether were correct actually and einstein/and his contemporaries were wrong on photon's interpreation. 

if ether interpretation were to stand still, time dilation would be defined by the ether's dragging factor to a moving photon.  of why photon has no time to travel. it instantly travels to any point but it when traveling at light speed, interfaces to too many universe versions.  that drags lags its eigenstate change to a hysteresis loop.    maybe recursively so that at that limit hysteresis becomes the standard in a not taking time even state change constantly. 

so this lagging of ether (multiverse ether) of making eigenstates go to hysteresis loops (to slow down their exact definite iteractions to become more super positioned and there by taking more time compared to a standing still reference frame) is back again in our discussions of physics 100 years later afterwards which 1900s physics made ether concept invalid. whilst possibly they were also wrong in that. they had not very included the multiverse factor in that.

they had not thought hysteresis loops behaviours models in that. 

so what this means -> in hysteresisi loops mode  somewhat physics slows down.  or compared to an eigenssystem which abruptly swithces between lesser eigenstates. 

so the modes of the hysteresis and eigenstate change equilibra and their modes would define why how so clocks works differently.

and in such definition  set where ether reintroduces to physics concepts 100 years later wrongly removed from physics science methodology by then with yet again incomplete wrong frameworks, 

so yet we had not deciphered formulations of but we need to decipher formulations to these starting theorem ideas. of initially starting with such perspect with yet topological illiterate perspects. (e.g. without any analytical D1/D2 or any topological concept definition of euclidean percepted universe in reference frame, current discussion theories are just yet lacking the topological literacy since i need ot study to revisit topology to add to framework discussions)

so this is just one theory among countless many possible ones. countless many topological definitions. e.g. there could be many alternate definitions with topological space point definition being very alternate e.g. there could also exist a theory which point count in nonvelocity frame is more or less.  the topology of space time in these theories should always been modular (changeable) (alike intuitionistic maths logic module being modular metaphorically) going with a standard topology to define a framework seems rather incomplete. 

 but starting point, with illitereate yet topologically ideas, we reintroduce the ether concept which 1900s physicsts wrongly removed from physics science by then. (I mean they with photon experiments decided ether theory were incorrect in 1930s/1940s times ) 

but their science methods were not abstract enough by then. and they had a single universe reference frame in their methods.  (unless they talk of the entanglement topics they also discuss) 

although they invented correctly working methods in many configurations, its yet incomplete.

they wrongly removed ether concept imho. that the lagging factor of the ether of the multiverse. possibly creating some hysteresis loops to eigenstates which makes the high velocity having entity's internal time frame to relatively slow down to the stationary entity's time frame. (the stationary one having less hysteresis alike back and forth switching behaviours so thinks time passed fastly in his side) 

whilst more multiverse interfaced reference frame then thinks time passed slowly in his reference frame.

so there is a point where time relativistically stops. if going too fast. the theorems as they mention.  for htat means possibly that much eigenstate hysteresis loops that it gets lost in a hystereis recursively that time even does not flow. (as time does not iterate to the photon itself. its at one moment at somewhere and other moment at somewhere with no time passing) 

------------------------------------

so the more hysteresis loops the time clocks slower. in this new yet again pre 1900s ether physics framework introduced framework. 

yep throw away 1900s physics and revert to 1800s mindset in this new theorem where we introduce ether but of multiverse ehter and hysteresis loops in eigenstate changes behaivours which is the actual causes of slowing down of time factor. 

this is the first theory thought but not formulated yet. there is many other such theorems to be thought studied to. 

in such initial theory, we need to define the abstraction of hysteresis loops of eigenstates that slows the time.

and if the speed of light is moment where this hysteresis becomes recursive,, threshold where it just gets lost in hysteresis, than in speed of light travel no time would pass to the traveling entity. 

but physics rules would also not work as expected when just reaching that threshold possibly. or returning from such threshold to less-light speed level.

so thinking all the intricacies of the such light speed vicinity physics,  it would always require an alcubierre drive concept to such method to make sure molecular structure of the space craft is not disassembled of course. 

i mean a void concept. which reduces the bindedness to multiverse factor inside space craft. where the inner side of space craft does not bind to the outer multiverse that much and but gradually void (not fully void possibly) has an insulation layer to the multiverse in such space craft idea.

and outer layer? going with speed of light? where fullhysteresis condition threashoned reached happens?  

so this method wouldnt work very much possibly since physics wont be controllable in full hysteresis threshold (speed of light) 

but so this idea needs to be supported with again alcubierre drive approaches but with considering the multiverse.

so without exotic materials to create alcubierre warp, one method could be thought of after discovering the reverse causal links of such system and hacking it engineering it  jump in 5d.  

since we dont think there might be easy to find hacks to do change physics regimen outside physics craft. so it rather requires some hack to have it multiverse interface concept to jump in 5d to an interfacing where it warped and tooked more than light could travel without falling to hysteresis concept /uncontrollable physics side. 

its that in any case of courses there should be insulations insulator voids in space craft to space craft people. e.g. since to ensure molecular stability and no physics regimen change in inside of the faster than light space craft which by the figured out methods jumps 5d with yet not deciphered ingenius methods/design.

so alcubierre drive concept is a nice starting point. but we need to make it move in 5d multiverse (jump.) (faster than light jump without uncontrollable hysteresis condition of spacecraft outerside molecules)

  

so we the post 2000s pysicists amateur physicists, are sick and tired of 1900s physics. which is incomplete and limits humanity's creativity factor against space time travel. although mostly correct in its reference of frame its incorrect-incomplete imho in universal frame. 

so when you thought that hysteresis condition of light photon is some threashold that is unpassable where no higher speed can be achieved than light's speed, you are possibly wrong. you need to decipher the hysteresis loop structure of photon and design new materials to enable some faster than that speeds capable (going to less rate hysteresis ) having quantum material design. 

 just becuase photon goes to hysteresis endlessly does not mean you can not quantum design a material alternate material which has less hysteresis behaviour.  (so no 1900s physics you can invent a material thats faster than light. your reference of frame is for only photon (nonengineered thingy) ) 

the amateur physicist should understand remove limits in mind that ---> 

--> unlike 1900s physics -> photon does not define the limits of science nor the space time travel capabilities (unlike 1900s scientists idea/reference of frame)  

so its a race of ether's hysteresis factor versus quantum material design to overcome it. for spacecraft's hull design techniques. 

and mechanisms of insulators either. to designed meticulously. 

so the engineering is all about not even about kinetic nor potential energy concepts. its rather about racing against ether (if metaphorcally kinetically) and multiverse 's lag/hysteresis . and multverse drag (hysteresis concept).  (referencing 1800s physics 'ether' concept)

you might invent methods that requires even less kinetic nor potential energy to overcome multiverse's hysteresis concepts.

so do not think energy concept of 1900s physics is accurate. that being also valid in a specific frame but not universally. 

this topics of spacecraft design in this topic are not even energy related at all. (neither kinetic nor potential) but its all about multiverse's  drag. and you dont need to always do newtonian kinetic potential methods  to encounter that.  

so in this new methodology  is about reducing multiverse's effect. (multiverse surrounding) and engineer advanced quantum materials to jump inside in it. 

----------------------------------------------

so the e=mc2  is somewhat single universe newtonian physics in my opiniion. 

you dont need that much kinetic energy for kinetic energry.  

i mean for people thinking speeding a more complex than photon type mass having thingy to speed of light would require immense energy -> thats also incorrect possibly (incomplete) 

you do not consider that thats only because of the  multiverse's drag factor but maybe with some engineered insulation principles you dont even need that much kinetic energy as emc2 defines.

its that how default photon behaves does not generalize how rest of physics behaves actually.

photon is not engineered first of all.

second hmm this is yet too newtonian still emc2. I mean correct in its frame. but still. there might be hacks to encounter multiverse's drag (which is not energy concept what people call as energy) which afre not done with newtonian kinetic methods. 

you dont have to go newtonian principles to encounter emc2. you dont need that much kinetic energy as you think its required. if you encounter multiverse like that its like that. but there must be alternate methods to insulate drag without requiring kinetic energy (e.g. you dont need rocket kinetic logic to encounter multiverse drag most possibly) you dont possibly need the newtonian emc2 conversion.

it all requires understanding the hysteresis loop structures of how interfacing is done to mjultiverse and hacking it so that you dont need to apply newtonian kinetics to overcome multiverse's drag(alike in rocket logic)

so this is about designing insulators and advanced quantum material design to meticulously engineer structures which controlled engineered hysteresis situation that which interfaces to multiverse thereby you dont any more newtonian emc2 alike kinetic energy to travel in space time.  

  so its time to understand emc2 is again a newtonian physics concept. and 1900s physics are also newtonian. 

newton were a genius ahead of his time. but his concepts were not multiverses based.

but 1900s physicst emc2 concept is yet still newtonian. whilst in those times they started to discover quantum physics they still went full newtonian in their  framework definitions.

emc2 is still very newtonian concept and very incomplete.  (not universal)

you dont need that much kinetic energy. energy concept of 1900s pyhsics is incorrect/incomplete imho.

its time to revert to 1800s ether concepts but ether being multiverse. and the thingis about creating intelligent material designs to encounter ether. and no you dont need emc2 to go faster than light. 

if you are a photon you might need only :)  

but responsibility of 2000s physicsts (unlike 1900s scientists their era)  is to be more practic than photon :) 

i mean you just because a bare photon particle/wave behaves like that does not mean you need also emc2 alike energy requirement to give kinetic push to spacecrafts hulls. 

photon is a thing of nature.  not engineered.  emc2 is just only photon's requirement. but does not limit the boundaries of science of space time travel neither. 

photon behaves like that due to its hysteresis constraints hysteresis relation to multiverse. 

but this does not mean that you cant define advanced spacecraft hull which has less multiverse drag and requires not emc2.   (with engineered hysteresis designs) 

emc2 is only for natural sciences photon concept.  it is not a limit for engineering advanced material science.

emc2 might accurately model the such nondesigned materials energy requirements or particles physics energy constraints in standard multiverse interfacing  model but if you start to engineer hysteresis loops and insulators for multiverse to encounter drag of multiverse ether,  it wont be effective/required that much kinetic or potential energy to speed up a space craft.

so next time you think to warp requires immense amount of kinetic/potential/magnetic whatever form of energy,  know that you are thinking incomplete. 

i mean people thinking warp is impossible since requires also immense amount of energy. is still an incomplete nonuniversal thought pattern. its because emc2 is not a universal theorem, people wrongly consider it as if it requires energy to move a  space craft. no it does not. it can move if you go newtonian and apply kinetic energy. of course it can. but you dont need that. to encounter multiverse' drag/hysteresises you might design advanced materials with insulators concepts so that you overome multiverse drag with also not needing the immense energies stated by emc2 principle (which is not universal, emc2 is only for natural sciences (for photon) its not for quantum designed materials)

so next time you limit your ideas your creativity just due to emc2 -> dont. emc2 is not universal. emc2 is only for photon. do not limit your creativity with 1900s science.  (to the amateur physicst reading blog)

its long past 2000s get over with 1900s science.  has been a century and still people thinking with 100 years ago's incomplete natural science concepts which were discovered for photon actually of how photon naturally behaves but does not mean a limitation actually. 

so do not limit your creativity with emc2 you dont need energy that much to counter multiverse ether's drag/hysteresis. 

emc2 is yet a very newtonian notion.  i mean even if 1900s started quantum physics side. but still notion of emc2 is based on newtonian mindset.

those time physicsts even if started quantum physics and discussed quantum physics they had not applied quantum perspect very much to emc2.  (and its ok to have them think like that since they invented very important things by those time frame, i mean it defines how photon behaves correctly. correct. but why photon behaves like that were not modeled by that era since they newly started these topics by then. i mean they invented very important science frameworks so that future inventions could happen. same alike newton. newton invented newton principles/along with leibniz etc. then einstein and his colleagues scientists invented following new inventions up to newtonian physics and invented quantum physics also all together. and then in post 2000s we are inventing new thoeries based on their inventions of both newton and einstein /leibniz/bohr etc. science goes like this. everyone invents based on what previous people invented. yep. ) 

so then physics science afterwards wrongly setting up  a limit of emc2 rule to themselves in last 100 years only because peoplle that newly started these discussions inventions in that era initially discovered such photon behaviour is a philosophically wrong attitude. 

so to amateur physicist ->  do not limit your creativity with emc2 you dont need energy that much to counter multiverse ether's drag/hysteresis.   emc2 is 1900s science and is incomplete(is per photon alkie things only) and not universal. (by then they newly started quantum theoreis so of course they still went newtonian in emc2 ) (of course their inventions are amazing. but they newly started newly invented quantum physics by then. so they still had gone newtonian mindset -> e.g. as very visible in emc2 )

--------------------------------