disgusting terrsts of foreign gypsies foreign terrorst grp/cult

 yep from home assistant  hobby project study  to plugin coding tasks intermittently (since plugin task is very boring) and then now switched to spatial dimensions decoding task of warp project. 

of 3d spatial dimensions could been generated from 0 dimension poset definition ->

yep some how the lower order of 3  parameters of a group  does a normal subgroup thingy but not 4th such parameter could do that. and for time parameter its still at not any kernel but forwarding. 

so somehow the first 3 order of such groups parameters becomes emerged kernel of dynamics but not the 4 element from such grp.  

to decode that in poset based definition then..

so dimensions is like why its 3d? because i believe so the emerged kernel of the dynamics of the universe crystallization has natural emergence of 3 member of kernel.  but for 4th it might also be a kernel in some larger probablitiy crystallization volume maybe. 

since this system crystallizes on a near probability set always,   then the emerged systems even kernel size must be limited and emerged kernel size in universe crystallization somehow happens 3 in its posets crystallizations.

logically thinking it makes sense.  i mean since there is some near probability crystal forming (metaphoric crystal) -> since its about reduction of entire probabilityscape to set of near probabilities (-> metaphoric crystallization)  then there is reduction in parameters and visibly due to that reduced parameter scope  the kernel size of  some parameter in output crystallized universe usually has kernel count of 3 or less. but not 4 most of the time. (emerged kernel of near probability set crystallization ) 

so i think i think this could be a starting idea of how spatial dimensions form. must be a group element type but has its emerged kernel size as 3 of a naturally emerging kernel of the probability system dynamic of crystallization in that scope.

so its not that there is 3 perpendicular axis spatial thingy.  its rather a group  of 3 kernel size of which somehow emerged dynamics has mapping of identity (e.g.   this group be a then the emerged probabilty dynamics be b for instance 

for a * b -> Ib  for instance the natural emerging kernel of a group has size 3 (normal subgroup)  (gosh i need to revisit studying grp topic since i forgot some but still I can think ideas with but need to revisit study again since I hadnt studied any to last 1.5 year since due to second project )   

so its not that multiverse might not produce 4 dimensions it just can not emerge in crystallization of emerged crystalization probability dynamics.

i mean for a parameter system to have a large size kernel it must have a dynamics pattern right? 

so -> somehow the emerged dynamics of crystallization always creates some 3 size kernel for spatial thingy. 

possibly can not create 4th order kernel. 

that to be investigated.

then how to bind this spatial dimensions generation topic to the 4th dimension of perceived universe which is somewhat poset ordering based perception. 

hmm. lets think and try to bind all these together botht he posets of sheaves of multiverse and this initial starting idea of dimensions being naturally emerged kernel of  crystallization dynamics of a grp parameter.  

so lets think all together with concepts like tarski banach topic's cohesion free ideas and with category theory,  how such 3 kernel size could emerge in whatever underlying multiverse crystallization and analyze it in category theory with taking some improvisions from mindset of Banach Tarski and initial starting idea of how kernel 3 size emerges as an emerged perceived dimension count property of the perceived crystallized universe version. 

so this topic requires some studying to grp topics alike and category diagrams based representations and analysis of initial starting ideas to the topic. of how such first 3 order based some kernel emerges but not 2 or not 4 kernel size?   it must be related to the dynamics of the crystallization. 

so in this thought idea (starting idea of 0 dimensions), dimensions is rather kernels a normal subgroup of a universe crystallization dynamics. 

but then after decoding these I would understand what spatial cartesian coordinate systems distance e.g.  what does that mean in such abstractions?

I mean what is 1 billion kms and 1 kms in such definition of such grp parameter? 

I mean since we want to invent warp, decoding also this is very important.

and so but that be related to also time dimensions posets surely. but so a unified idea would create the idea mathematically (yayyy mathematical engineering with category thry) to create an idea which could be a possible explanation of the perceived universe's dimension and time concepts. 

but that would still not be sure if universe is like that. but lets start with that. maybe such idea might enable warp invention ideas to check fastly. 

so starting idea of warp project is -> what if there is actually no spatial dimensions? 

so this is just an idea. no one can know if universe is like that or not. 

so first starting idea is this and to create a math framework based on is the starting idea to then if could figure out a correct axiomatically correct mathematical definition/framework that could generated perceived universe's spatio-temporal concept,   then it would be one of the possible ideas of how universe (multiverse is)

 so in warp invention project-> starting idea is -> what if actually there is no spatial dimensions? 

so in that project i start from 0 dimensions then would switch to also holographic universe theory of 2d aand i think i would check also string theory later.

but i think 2d or any static number seems logically illogical. why a constant? i would rather think its rather 0 or infinite at all.  i mean e.g. perceived universe is 3d does not mean its 3d. 3 in 3d universe is an emerged parameter in perceived universe.

so when people talk of a theory which says that there is 2 dimension count in the original (not the emerged not the perceived but the actual ) universe  it seems by its definition seems slight illogical to me. 

since where that constant comes from? if there is a constant there must be a generator universe which has generated that where suhc constant emerged.

so of course there could be many emerged universe dynamics surely but i think better start with the most basical inductive one. and where the generator (not the emerged/not the perceived) universe has dimension count of 0 --> since i mean if it were a constant then that would require again a generator universe again that has generated it.  it could also been like that. but lets start with an easier to formulate idea right? instead of chain of emerged universes theorem which might be formulations axioms wise harder to initially start formulating lets start with basical idea where the generator (not the perceived not the emerged) multiverse universe thingy has 0 dimensions.  not a constant alike 2d alike holographic universe says or constant having string theory neither.  lets start initially with 0 dimensions yep.

  so i dont think its string theory. 

because string theory says there is dimensions you can not detect. --> I refute. 

i think dimensions is rather an emerged count limit of naturally emerged normal subgroup's cardinality/count.

if the dynamics of universe crystallization had more than 3 kernel size than it would created 4th dimension and that would be perceiveable surely.  not that its any curved dimensions.  dimensions are same not different than each other. (maybe time is different maybe maybe that poset ordering maybe) but otherwise the spatial dimensions i believe is all same all uniform kernel members of a dynamics of crystallization behaviour of multiverse.

 

so i definitely in start idea of refute holographic universe and string theory ideas.

for holographic universe i dont refute exactly but i just said why 2 then? then they shoudl explain the generator universe which generated the 2 constant there? right? 

for string theory, since it has dimensions that differ and not easily perceivable, i refute on that aspect. since dimensions i believe are all same (group members kernels of a group, noone of is different than other) 

and just because we have limited 3d dimensions is because the kernel normal subgroup is like that imho if the dynamics of universe crystallization let 4 then we would have 4d universe and it would be same to us as if it were 3d. i mean hmm there is no curved dimensions that are divergent from the any 3d dimensions i think. 

this starting idea thereby initially refutes holographic universe's one aspect and refutes string theory idea initiallly. 

but this idea is not axiomized/formulated yet as seen.

so need to decode this idea's possible maths  category theory diagrams to create an axiomatically valid theorenm of 0 dimensions theory of starting initial idea in warp invention ideas thinking blog section.