yep I also got curious to the mystery I had read in news.
e.g. Eskridge's passing away topics.
and I investigated some title I saw in one of the slides during investigating due to curiosity, I saw some idea of Woodwards titled physicist.
I still have no idea why Eskridge were gone. but the Woodward principle like principles tackled seemed indeed logical in also my idea of where spatiality is caused by generators which in relatedly has more hysteresis of its eigenstates compared to less generator config and more hysteresis means more gravity insulation imho and longer poset diagrams for slowening time perception. although i dont know if momentum is conserved cosmologically. I also think distance objects also has same influence in such 2.d theory. but I dont think necessarily that there is momentum conservation. albeit there might be a side effect in some configs/perception. but possibly not the rule but some percepted thing caused by the framework.
I dont know about GR topics yet alot (general relativity formulations) but I do try to craft my formulations from scratch with using existing frameworks rather as data/intuition source.
so about the idea I saw:
hmm soo -> cosmological momentum conservation -> dunno. have no idea. but might exist but possibly not but rather some perception of the framework generated by the underlying framework. but does not mean the generic perception does not mean there is such cosmological conservation there and there of momentum (albeit I shared the perspective also that distant cosmological objects also effect locality, there is no distance concept in the underlying framework studied by me other than the perceived/generated spatiality which is a byproduct but not that framework works like that)
the second important perspect of theory that accelerated capacitor has mass fluctioations -> I totally agree that this could happen. but to my theory there is also yet no mass concept. its like, hmm rather interacting eigenstates. and do not expect me to know about higgs boson very much now yet (would learn on when studying). but what i mean that is more about hysteresis concept in my model/framework rather than parametric definitions variables like mass. Its rather the initial idea I htought is abouthow much an eigenstates goes to hysteresis mode (loops in configs) instead of iterating in generator of spatiality or interacting wiht other eigenstates (that theoyr part I hadnt build fluently yet).
but definitely the intuition seemed correct. the scientist idea has a point in my perspect regarding this second topic of that accelerated system might indulge in different universe behaviour. that I definitely agree.
but the only unclear part of his theory is the cosmological momentum preservation. that I cant agree yet. cause maybe the local momentum preservation is just a perception alike time perception (that it does not exists a time dimension) (it might be similar for momentum, that its a perceived emerged trait of some configs of the generator of multiverse systems but not something valid for entirety of the emerged system)
so, what I thought when investigating (alike Sherlock) the mystery of Mss. Amy Eskridge, I came upon this topic which i saw in one slide there.
and I were wondering if Eskridge's ideas are like utterly theoretic or some applied physics? and there when I saw this above topic, I got to understand that it has relevance to applied physics also.
so I still hadnt understood whilst detectiving whom murdered Mss. Amy Eskridge. (herself? some one?)
my theories ->
--- it could be really like she were murdered for invention's paths. but this also at the same time does not make sense. I mean why so? unless its oil or such industries behind it. (i mean reason of murder when investigating the murder in case it were murder)
I dont believe that this idea might created impulse alot in engine form. but even a researcher making such path claims and pitch deck might disturbed oil alike industries which might then did such horrific murder.
-- or else, it could be some crazed ufologists murdered her to create some hype to uap/ufo topic:S that is an alternate definition. i mean like some crazed type ufologists (not talking of the normal people whom believes to ufos uaps but i meant maybe crazy type ufologists also exists, and they might targeted her maybe? maybe just to create some crazy conspiracy they might attacked her maybe some delusional type ufologist. ) targeting her alike topic maybe. some crazy type people might had targeted her. maybe she had alot spotlight by then and a crazy person might targeted her alike might be the second possibility.
I think I hadnt taken the objections that physics were not her field. her father were the physicists were not he? so she neednt need to invent the equations there as her father would do. I think if this were a murder, the actual intimidated were her father. whom they tried to break heart very much and intimidate. (oil oindustry? whomever behind her murder if were not suicide.) if it were not oil industry, then must be imho crazy type ufologists behind her murder. maybe a delusional maniac crazy type ufologist obsessed her due to her research topic and attacked her. thats even more plausible than oil industry being the murderer imho. although one cant be sure. maybe its the oil industry. but still, it seems more plausible that its a crazed type ufologist behind her murder. (if were not suicide) but it seems very suspicious to be suicide indeed. definitely someone had murdered her. she does not seem any mentally ill. she seems full of life. she does not seems any suicidal but rather very inspired person for their inspiration topics of inventing some exotic physics technologies. so with such motivation, it seems very illogical she would do such thing. I rather resembled them to as like apprentice and master alike. I mean his father actually writing the physics theories but she is the apprentice not to very as much as in to physics as her dad but rather very inspired by physics science and promoting the inspiring exotic physics topics she learns from her father's studies to the topic. and so I dont think she is the actual brain of that exotic sciences institute but rather the CTO or alike but her father being the actual powerhouse /brain behind it. she is also very intelligent seemingly genius level intelligent, but in other fields not exactly physics maybe. but apprentice of her dad alike in that domain. which visibly vert inspired by the exotic physics topics and reflects such inspiration. does not surely look like anyone whom would commit suicide.
it seemed very tragic:S and does not seem as a suicide imho:S
no i dont think it seems any like suicide.
this person also got curious to this very tragic news she saw in news (which is in every news paper currently) and concluded that yep we people do not think it seems as suicide.
Yorumlar
Yorum Gönder