disgusting terrsts of foreign gypsies foreign terrorst grp/cult

 hadnt read anthropology for a while and read currently slightly some paragraphs.

hmm  I also think that unlike Durkheim the inherent cognitive mechanisms creates the social mechanisms not the contrary. 

but I also disagree with dialectics method of thought. I also disagree of that this dialectics analysis method is correct and i find it over cartesian and over simplified of how to consider neuro anthropology.

but the rift between how systems behave and their studies of how to conceptualize them is always a rough topic. I mean just you can not simply throw away dialectics method of thought either that much easily. in focus of neuroanthropology. 

what we saw from the lowest ontology level of social mechanisms which is human mind, what we saw in unrelated hebbian neural models and their related analysis is that,  the dialectics cartesian thought pattern is not exactly a very full correct matching up cartesianist model of how human mind operates.

but: 

it does not mean that it is not fully wrong either.

its just because hebbian mechanisms do not work physically with a dialectic underlying mechanism, their generated behaviour creates some limited thought capacity and patterns and that my friend, is might be in par with the generated social theories like dialectic method in analysing human thought in as lowest ontology layer of social mechanisms/social structures.

 

so even if neuroanthropologs  thinks universalism of structurualism might be wrong, we think maybe neuroanthropologists are wrong.

its that just becauses hebbiian models of mind might be very intricate and more complex than simple mode of dialectics,   their generative thought power might indeed be relevant to that as anthropologists has proven such topics in their studies of ontology levels with just direct introspection of plateu of human cultures.

soooo,  --->

what i think that there are universal thought patterns, e.g. reciprocity. and fairness. that is common trait of human thought.  thats common to even amazonic tribes and universal. 

but rarely iin field anthropology studies, we see that reciprocity principle is broken.  e.g. cultures where sociopathy behaviour is normalized.  that my friend, we label as a significant divergence to human cultures. 

e.g. take for instance, the anthropologically very weirdo behaviour of -> thinking false slanders to people outside of your culture ---> and this definitely my friend abides dialectics where that divergent culture partially follows the universals of opposition of  dialectical ideas in their mind patterns. but what is not normal is that the delusionality of that. --> that its a pattern of thought mechanism in such cultures to think delusionally false slanders to outside of their culture. that my friend is the thing we tagged as something very divergent to human behaviour. 

I mean the behaviour attender either consiously or unconsciously (I mean inherently) likes to think in oppositions. thats is ok as a human behaviour. not a divergent behaviour. but what is anormal is what is divergence is that such mind template normalizes this as thinking false delusional slanders to outside.  

because somewhat somehow the outsiders breaks their perception of world. and even if uncorrect, using slander as a cope mechanism to perceive world in its own mind template structures, with behaviour pattern of slandering outsiders with false slanders,  is what we found very unusual very divergent behaviour to human behaviour my friend.

but in the outer studies of ethnographic anthorpology, there is shocking stories of cultural divergences. in the field. 

e.g.  in one study (whereas this even shocked the anthropologist) people of some place built some cultural mechanism, where when someone does not obey their cultural perspect, they punish with falsely slandering the disobeyer of their cultural code.

usually marriages are one basic mechanisms how cultures developed. e.g. in such studied culture, there the elders designs the marriages/decides on. 

in one case, (which such story most possibly routinely happens),  there one couple disobeys and one guy marries some woman whom he were not let to.  ok?  then  there their culture code then has a mechanism in such case, where the parent of the woman slanders the guy with many slander types.  and then in their culture the falsely slandered also accepts even although everyone knows its untrue. but their culture code normalizes this type of punishment where the culture code disobeyed (not listened to elders in marriage situation) person is condemned and punished with false slandering. ---> see this were a story where some story even shocked the field studiest anthrolog there. where the anthropolog found it very strange, where a culture normalizes false slandering as a mechanism.  

although we thought that its a rare behaviour where righteousness gets completely left out and wrong becomes right in such cultural practice where false slandering (sociopathy) is normalized in culture its own.  strange right? but we thought thats a very rare case/rare situaiton in world cutlures indeed.

until seeing that e.g. i saw this behaviour also in some foreign culture.   although the context is not about marriage either. 

in that case, the culture person employs in various cases human behaviour of human thought again similar to all cutlrues. and also follows perpetuates very definite dialectic mode of thought patterns, that is also human behaviour.  but what is very unusual is that either consiously or unconsciously such over dialectic thinking foreing culture members tends to think delusional false slanders to outside of their culture. Thats  the anthropologically shocking behaviour that shocks the anthropologists which encounters this behaviour.

i mean there are universals in all cultures. and even not in contact with remaining  human tribes type amazonic tribes even behaves along with universals. which has homomorphisms isomorphisms to other rest of humanity. alike Levi would argue we guess.

but diverging from Levi's humanitarian aspect, but following savage mind perspect on that either, we in modern cultures sometimes see tribes which behaves very irrational. 

i mean there the human mind perceives everything in patterns and dialectics it seems. but such tribes has an unusual unright behaviour of thinking false slanders to outside. and doing delusional enmity with thinking false slanders to outside,  is some really insane behaviour pattern indeed.   

i mean its like their method of enmity.

e.g. in amazonic tribes maybe some spears might be form of enmity right? and some mythological taless/and fight between opposite tribes etc.  

but in modern version of it, spears turns to in some unusual cultures, enmity method turns to false slandering attempts.  that we find very unusual behaviour. 

since every normal mind  find its not right to use false slandering as an enmity method. where spear turns to false slandering. either conscisous or unconsciously such method of enmity is observed. 

so we agree with Levi on universals. and we agree on his humanitarian perspect. but what we disagree on that either at the same time is that  we dont find that divergent cultural practices of tribes (e.g. modern tribes which normalizes false slandering as an accepted cultural pattern) that we can not interpret or agree any upon.  alike the shock of the anthropolog of that field study doing in a place where he finds shockingly that place where did studied normalizes false slandering as a cultural method. e.g. even the false slandered accepts that very insane behaviour.  

so in ontology levels of culture and its different iterations there is alot commonalities but somethings stringent divergences which shocks person. 

so the tribal behaviour is visibly sometimes common in human cultures. but then,  also dialectics behaviour is also common. 

but then the tribal behaviour in modern version pops up its patterns with also dialectics but where spears turns to false slandering to outside tribes.  that shows us that levi's ideas are correct. of savage human mind ideas and universals ideas.

so its like such modern tribes are like finding amazonic tribe behaviour back in modern behaviour indeed. 

where spears of amazonic tribes which levi studied becomes metamorphoses to false slandering with untrue slanders. 

i guess that mentality whenever we see a foreign race tries to false slander us, is that common amazonic tribe behaviour, only that spear turns metamorphoses to false slandering behaviour. where we are the opposite tribe the forieng race there sees as the opposite tribe and aggresses withs its modern spears where modern spears are false slander agression.

so maybe this is also a human behaviour although with my shock of this very unusual (only seen in amazonic tribes that tribal behaviour of tribal aggression) behaviour observance I initialy thought this is unhuman bheaviour but along analysis in blog, we discovered that this is indeed human behaviour again but tribal tribe aggression behaviour where spears turns to false slandering.

so visibly the tribe of that foreign race sees us as an opposite tribe. and sees world with dialectics. alike how amazonic tribes has mythologies and some dialectical thought patterns. and then there is constant enmity between tribes in amazon, in this modern version of aggressor tribe of foreign race, visibly in that dialectics of thought patterns of this modern tribe but amazonic tribe alike foreign race, in their dialectics, they place outside tribes to the worst dialectic opposite thought patterns in their thought patterns either consisoucly or unconsciously they tend to think in their dialectical thought pattern they place outside tribes to delusional false slanders and then they also reflect this mental patterns (delusional and tribal) with dogin false slandering aggression aggress to outside tribes with very insane false slander types. 

 so this is also human behaviour. but very similar to early anthropological condition behaviour of amazonic tribe behaviour. 

look low iqqued people now took consciousness literal from this philosophical discussion and put to slandering condition. hey less evolved uneducated illiteral sociopath psycho,   if you had any intellectual capacity/knowledge you would understand that the consciousness described here means collective consciousness. alike jungian consciousness.  but since you are a lesser evolved low iqqued psycho you understood the blog paragraph with not ever possible to any intellect' type impossible meaning. you are a trash type gene of human  kind. you are disgusting.  hey low iqqued low intellect psycho, here consciousness means do you know what it means? no no we dont think you with your less evolved low iqqued condition  can ever read and grasp a paragraph correctly cause you lack skills to grasping what you read even with your intellect low less evolved mind. 

hey psycho consciousness means, its like when you speak language you do it unconsciously.  same goes for cultural evolution's this topic, for dialectics patterns in mind , they are similar to language and unconsciously becames thoughts of person's patterns. its not something like consciousness as in a person's individual consciousness but it means some higher ontology discussion (an  intellectual topic which your low iq visibly hadnt grasped when reading) which means some durkheim and jungian consciousness level.  (Sociologically higher ontology level type of consciousness it means, it means collective consciousness but since you are a low iqqued psycho you can not even grasp what intellectual bloggers blogs means cause you never heard of Levi in your entire disgusting low intellect life right? or Jung? or Wittgenstein? maybe Wittgenstein's ideas study topic  might be more relevant to how your disgusting low iqqued mind works.  you less evolved low intellect creature's this false contextualization attack were again insanely disgusting you less evoled nonintellect psycho minded neanderthal or denisova gened (at iq related loci) type and also at the same time dunning kruger syndrome having creature lesser intellect creature.  lesser human.  nonintellectual creature. iq olarak az evrilmis yaratik. (bir de kendi dilimde tepkimi gostereyim sapik psycho foreign race whomever its behind the latest false contextualization aggress to recent blog entry)  )   

no no wittgensterin might not be the most relevant case of your low intellect condition's analysis method but i think again Levi might be. your low iq results in your low intellect language capability where you read and understand a literal in its unthinkably impossible meaning due to your less evolved condition of iq and mind template.  

I mean how you actually think is something unconscious,, coming from collective consciousness of your tribe/culture. alright? this type consciousness is in intellectual domain analyzed by sociology and anthropology and linguistic sciences, alright? but since you are a low iqqued low intellect less evolved neanderthal or denisova psycho, you less evoled denisova couldnt even interpret what I had written and interpreted it with most impossible meaning and attempted an information manipulation attack with using consciousness context in a horrific disgusting news and doing information manipulation attack to my blog with such pattern. 

hey you less evoled tribal psycho,  just please educate your self somewhat some . cause you are like genetic trash of humanity with your less evolved condition which constantly attempts information manipulation attacks/aggression to outside of your intellect and iq evolution wise less evolved tribe.

you are truly very disgusting and very less evolved compared to intellectual evolution condition of humanity.  disgusting psycho which did a recent a very disgusting information manipulation attack to blog's this paragraphs. 

you are truly genetic trash. you psycho fraudster. which took consciousness literal from blog (where there that consciousness literal refers durkheim and jungian and even wittgenstein concepts, where that unconsciously thinking dialectical thought patterns is the unconsciousness there means some sociological concept not consciousness direct definition by itself. but since you are a nonintellect psycho which when reads consciousness thinks of psycho ideas instead of durkheim/levi ideas due to your genetically and intellectually defected low iq condition you genetic trash less evolved disgust of humans disgusting less evolved type. ) 

just how you interpret what blogs says reflects your thought patterns and your thought patterns shows a very ignorasmus very nonintellect and psycho mind whomever you are whom directed this information manipulation aggress to blog. 

you less evolved psycho, genetic trash nonintellect disgusting creature.

 how could you take a literal from blog like that and do information manipulation attack to blog with placing consicousness in worst ever possible consciousness definition. hey less evolved psycho, when we mentioned unconscious thought patterns, itn means jungian consciousness and unconsciousness of dialectic thought patterns of mind that is a reference to durkheim and jungian and levi based anthropological collective consciousness definitions examples where it becomes even unconsciously programmed into mind.  either jungian or durkheim or levi.  but thats no where any related such discussion any to psycho version of consciousness definition you did recent information manipulation attack to our blog.

you genetic trash of human kind whichever foreign race were behind the recent false contextualization attack type information manipulation attack. you less evolved foreign race, you are truly nonintellect and very disgusting and how you interpret read our blog shows your less evoled prehistoric human mind thought patterns with sicko thought patterns.

when anyone says consciousness we intellectual people think is it  some durkheim or levi or jungian consciousness or is it some phycis theories universal consciousness definitions. noone of intellectual's minds thinks some psycho versions of consciousness topic.  but just because you are a less evolved nonintellect psycho  when you read consicousness literal in a blog, you with your disgusting nonintelelct and ignorasmus you think of impossibel to any intellect type of impossible meanings. you lack capability to grasp meaning of what is actually written we think your iq might be less than 90 due to your disgusting kruger syndrome behaviour and your inherent low iq which you reflect as information manipulation and false context attacks to bloggers blog content. you are truly a less evolved genetic trash & nonintellect psycho and very krugerish about your less evolved condition with such false context attack to intllectual bloggers type trash behaviour.  less evolved psycho.  disgusting nonintellect person.  we intellectuals disgust from your psycho mind. you are disgustingly psycho and nonintellect.

hey genetic trash know that we normally evolved intellect people think you like low iqqued (and also sharing kruger syndrome) people types as truly genetic trash and we see you as less evolved compared to homo sapiens condition due to your nonintellect and insanely psycho mind patterns.